Is it better to use Windows 2003 shared hosting than Windows 2008?
Is that true?
Oissite.com provides both and I don't know which one is more preferable.
Forum Advertisement ** This Advertisement Does Not Show To Registered Users **
If I were you, I would choose reputed web host. Can suggest hostdone.com!
Their windows hosting packages will meet your requirements.
So far, you will experience any downtime, and the servers will be fast.
Windows specialized web host will provide you with quality hosting service.
Aspnix.com windows hosting packages will be right choice for you, OP.
They are quick on replying to e-mails and good at helping and answering questions we might have.
My experience has been better than expected.
I think that you should compare offers and choose the suitable one. I recommend you to use Webintellects services which are provided with high stability for reasonable prices.
If you ask me I like Hostdone.com company and its windows hosting deals very much.
Their advantages:
Best Value For Your Money.
Host unlimited WEBSITES.
Load-Balanced Servers.
%99.9 Network uptime.
Generally 100% uptime, good pricing and professional service.
Windows hosting services from oissite.com is reliable and stable and one may use it with no doubts.
Their servers are rock-solid and uptime is high.
Give them a try.
I also think that Webintellects.com will be the best option for your needs. You will be pleased by their trustworthy services and skilful support team.
I would recommend 7host.com windows hosting plans more than highly.
The people on the site are so helpful.. The add-on scripts have worked almost flawlessly, and I have been able to fix minor glitches with no problems. I set up a community site that now has over 60 users in short order.
Linear Mode
