shared hosting

shershen · February 17th 2009, 04:56 AM

Two companies I was strongly recommend to use - serverpoint.com and cmbhosting.net.
Shared hosting which they offer seems very attractive for me.
So what company is better to use?

.amaZe · February 17th 2009, 10:11 PM

Hey, how are you?

Fernando · February 18th 2009, 04:05 AM

Well, from these two companies I would choose serverpoint.com services without any doubt because it is really flexible company which will meet all your specific demands. I have never heard about the second one, but their offers also are good ones.

~ServerPoint~ · February 19th 2009, 01:15 AM

Hello
Thank you very much for considering us.
I have to add that we are actually not the cheapest one. Feel free to ask any question you might have

roland · February 20th 2009, 07:02 AM

CMBhosting.net and ServerPoint.com ... hm ... shared hosting from them.
Well looking through their plans I want to say that their plans focus on delivering quality and full-featured services for their customers. Their support is always active and responsive.
Can choose any oа them 'cause they are both to my liking.

entropy · February 20th 2009, 09:48 AM

Not sure about thios hosts, however ServerPoint should be really good.

For shared hosting I personally recommend marblehost.com which is specialized in this hosting area offering affordable feature-rich shared hosting plans.

^Mike^ · February 27th 2009, 03:20 AM

nice deals are also offered by iwhic.com - the low cost company made from merger of several companies, demostrating the high quality. I suppose you ccan have a great solution from them.

alligator · March 3rd 2009, 06:53 AM

Taking into consideration the situation you have fetched up at, I strongly recommend you serverpoint.com - I would trust stability and honestly as this company has perfect reputation in web hosting industry. Saving one or two dollars per month is not worth the loss of a few hundred or a few thousand dollars when your site goes down.

~ServerPoint~ · March 4th 2009, 12:43 AM

We are here to stay and be sure that you will be delivered with the best quality

Director · March 4th 2009, 09:19 AM

marblehost.com has really not bad rates in terms of shared hosting services. The company offers many extras, which can be useful in the procvess of running a website. I advise to pay more attention to this provisder.

konttyy · March 5th 2009, 08:57 AM

CMBhosting.net ... I have heard many flattering feedbacks of their activity on the forums. Tye company has cheap hosting service that is welcome to many web masters. I'd use them.

JoeMatt · March 14th 2009, 04:10 AM

I would deal with serverpoint.com without any doubt because I think that these resourceful specification will satisfy you better than other ones:

Quote:

# 350GBs of web space
# RAID protected web space
# 3,500GBs of data transfer
# 350 reliable email addresses
# Anti-spam/virus protected email
# SSH, FTP, SFTP and SCP access
# host 5 web sites on one account
At $6.97

I consider it to be perfect shared web hosting offer!

AgniX · March 16th 2009, 10:21 AM

Alternatively You can have a look at apthost.com - the company is offering low cost and high quality webhosting deals, whai are currently possible to get by 15 % cheaper with the code winter09. I think this is really good point of getting a hosting.

Sesceww · March 19th 2009, 04:56 AM

Serverpoint.com will be better to choose and its reputation and stability go outside the bounds. And the abundance of good feedbacks about this company makes it the most preferable. They have reliable equipment, redundant bandwidth, and a highly-trained staff.

lozanoerwin · March 21st 2009, 02:09 AM

hands off I guess they are reasonable and reliable.

but I am still happy with my current.